Triangle (2009). Up until today I never truly looked into it's critical reception, but always assumed it was deemed 'bad' or was merely overlooked. Looking at Rotten Tomatoes this morning, I realize it has an 80% fresh critic score and a 66% fresh audience score, which I feel like I should be shocked by, but I'm not. It is a very tightly woven movie narrative that doesn't allow for many mistakes, and I'd argue that it narrowly avoids many narrative mistakes by keeping certain elements mysterious/vague on purpose without sacrificing a very basic fractured and disjointed story that you have to put together piecemeal without much in the way of guidance other than context clues. I probably sound like a vague and/or pretentious mad man trying to explain this movie without delving into what the movie is really about, but it's hard to really go into what the movie's about without spoiling the entire experience. If you're really into admittedly light psychological horror, scifi anthologies, Chris Nolan or David Fincher films, or just simple thought experiments, then you might get a kick out of it. I'd argue that it's far less cerebral than the above listed director's standard fare, but it's still quite the fun little mind bender that I spent a whole summer watching over and over again for fun. Go into it blind. That's how I went into it. I just discovered it on Scifi one summer and it kept coming back on, and I reveled in it pretty hard.